Comment on Did Stanford just prototype the future of AR glasses?

RainfallSonata@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• TimeSquirrel@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Why?

  source

  • LostXOR@fedia.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    That's a pretty cool idea, though I think it would be a challenge to align the plans perfectly with the actual construction site.

    source
• just_another_person@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  They already exist in much larger packaging.

  source

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    They already exist in much larger packaging.

    Nobody uses that stuff, though.

    source

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Sure they do. Hololens is used by a large swath of major engineering firms, I’ve seen people use the Quests fairly extensively for AR, and Apple somehow still sold out their pretty awful AR product as well.

      source
  • RainfallSonata@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Of course they exist.

    source

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      So they already “happened”.

      source

      • RainfallSonata@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        I think most people understand the difference between “existing” and “happening”.

        That was the whole point of the original comment.

        source