You’re being sarcastic but even small fees immediately weed out a ton of cruft.
Comment on Good Old Windows
korstmos@kbin.social 10 months ago
Because paying a few grand a year for a certificate somehow makes your software more trustworthy
Zalack@startrek.website 10 months ago
xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 10 months ago
They also weed out a lot of legitimate software, especially if it’s non-commercial.
Zalack@startrek.website 10 months ago
I’m not saying there aren’t downsides, just that it isn’t a totally crazy strategy.
WhyIDie@programming.dev 10 months ago
I remember that short time when Steam allowed anyone and everyone to self-publish without fees.
It was an interesting time.
RippleEffect@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Well it at least is an obstacle. Broke hackers won’t get it or will have to work harder to get around it.
Ddhuud@lemmy.world 10 months ago
That’s the intention. In reality lots of genuine devs can’t afford it, so people get accustomed to just ignore the whole thing.
ryannathans@lemmy.fmhy.net 10 months ago
Even more lols when you are gigabyte and your private key leaks. Also when you are gigabyte and your signed driver is used to privilege escalate malware.
yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 10 months ago
And you can still bypass it if you put your software in a .zip
smolyeet@lemmy.world 10 months ago
And that’s why certificates can be revoked, that’s the whole point, trust. It only costs a few hundred a year per Microsoft’s documentation and approved vendors so it doesn’t seem that much of an ask. At the very least you can look up the developer yourself, harder to do if the package has no identity associated with it
Tathas@programming.dev 10 months ago
Gigabyte has entered the chat.
magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 10 months ago
The original Twitter checkmark