The problem is that you're renting access to something you're not actually consuming.
But you are effectively consuming them. Just like renting books and movies, you nearly always don't need it again after you return it.
Nice talking point just to cover your bum from shilling.
Nice talking point just to cover your bum from shilling.
turmacar@lemmy.world 6 months ago
This isn’t new, everything has it’s place.
We rented a trench digger for the day from Home Depot in the 90s instead of buying one for thousands of dollars. That trench didn’t magically go away when we returned the tool. That we didn’t have access to the tool anymore was the plan.
Renting a U-haul for a move is incredibly more efficient than daily driving a giant box truck. Somehow, the things stay moved once the truck is returned.
john89@lemmy.ca 6 months ago
You didn’t subscribe.
turmacar@lemmy.world 6 months ago
So you just didn’t read the article?
Renting is the “subscription” you’re complaining about. You’re right that rent-to-own is a scam at best, but unlike most digital subscriptions you’re using the thing to do something. Like with all rentals there’s a break even line where you would’ve been better buying the thing if you use it often/long enough. But the service existing is not itself a bad thing.
sgtgig@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Oh my god dude renting has been a thing for centuries.