Comment on How rental ‘libraries of things’ have become the new way to save money

• john89@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  The problem is that you’re renting access to something you’re not actually consuming.

  Once you stop paying, you lose access and have nothing to show for it. They still have your money, though.

  This is different than, say, paying for electricity which is consumed and no longer available for either party after consumption.

  Sorry bud, you’re defending being scammed.

  source

  • turmacar@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    This isn’t new, everything has it’s place.

    We rented a trench digger for the day from Home Depot in the 90s instead of buying one for thousands of dollars. That trench didn’t magically go away when we returned the tool. That we didn’t have access to the tool anymore was the plan.

    Renting a U-haul for a move is incredibly more efficient than daily driving a giant box truck. Somehow, the things stay moved once the truck is returned.

    source

    • john89@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      You didn’t subscribe.

      source

      • turmacar@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        So you just didn’t read the article?

        One person hired a metal detector to hunt down the wedding ring they lost when camping in Sussex and found it within 20 minutes. Another rented a planer at £11 a day to fix two doors in her flat

        A handheld pressure washer is £12 a day, while garden shears are £3.50

        Renting is the “subscription” you’re complaining about. You’re right that rent-to-own is a scam at best, but unlike most digital subscriptions you’re using the thing to do something. Like with all rentals there’s a break even line where you would’ve been better buying the thing if you use it often/long enough. But the service existing is not itself a bad thing.

        source
      • sgtgig@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Oh my god dude renting has been a thing for centuries.

        source
  • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    The problem is that you're renting access to something you're not actually consuming.

    But you are effectively consuming them. Just like renting books and movies, you nearly always don't need it again after you return it.

    Nice talking point just to cover your bum from shilling.

    Nice talking point just to cover your bum from shilling.

    source

    • john89@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      But you are effectively consuming them. Just like renting books and movies

      No, you’re not. Consuming something means it is no longer available after consumption. We can’t “consume” media unless we destroy it afterwards.

      Sorry, you’ve been played by industry talking points just to get you to spend as much money as possible. Now you’re doing your part in perpetuating them.

      There’s a term for people like you, but I’ll refrain from using it here.

      Goodbye. You may have the last word since you need to push your products on others.

      source

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Ah yes, buying everything you don't need too long isn't consumerism but renting and reusing is

        source