Comment on please defederate from exploding-heads.com and rammy.site
nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year agoI’m not SDF, or even that familiar with the organisation, but I would argue we shouldn’t let such people use this instance. Or grandma from my example, for that matter.
I’m not sure that this approach is in-line with the org’s stated mission.
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
Oh, okay.
nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
This instance is run by a 501© non-profit and their stated mission is:
I didn’t necessarily take your statement to be ageist. However, considering the above, excluding those who may not have strong critical reasoning skills or understanding of the Internet really seems contradictory.
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
A 501© also has to steer clear of politics, at least on paper, which could be an issue here. It’s odd that I know that as a non-American.
nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
And neither hate speech nor speech aimed at inciting or celebrating violence against minority groups are considered protected, political speech. So, I would see that as a moot point. If it were a case of “we should de-federate because these are instances where policies are discussed that I disagree with”, you might have a point in that.
However, that’s clearly not the case. It took less than a minute, not searching, to find content from these instances that is using falsified information to demonize and foment hatred against those in the LGBTQ+, including communities dedicated to that purpose. Human rights and whether all deserve them is not a political topic, despite being made central to some political parties’ platforms. It is one of basic human dignity and ethics.