Comment on Gender-specific toilets to be required in non-residential buildings in England

CloutAtlas@hexbear.net ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• Barabas@hexbear.net ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  That would be a ‘universal’ toilet and thus allowed.

  According to ministers, 81% agreed with the intention for separate single-sex toilet facilities in a consultation on the proposals, while 82% also agreed with the intention to provide “universal” toilets – a self-contained, and a fully enclosed toilet room with a wash hand basin for individual use – where space allows.

  source

  • Adkml@hexbear.net ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    God these people are fucking stupid.

    That’s a gender neutral bathroom.

    It doesn’t mean there’s a stripper pole and a doctor handing out hormones.

    source

    • Barabas@hexbear.net ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      The thing they’re against is communal handwashing apparently.

      source

      • Wolfman86@hexbear.net ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Well…that’s where it starts.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • Yor@hexbear.net ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        This honestly feels like a bit at this point

        source
    • mynachmadarch@kbin.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Wait, your bathrooms don't have a doctor handing out shots hanging around in the corner?

      source

      • Emperor@feddit.uk ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Wait, your bathrooms don’t have stripper poles?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • llamajester421@kbin.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    What boggles me is that the latter "universal toilet" is what most conservatives ferociously battled when it is called a "gender neutral bathroom", like disabled bathrooms and residential ones. Face=palm.

    source
• Yor@hexbear.net ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Anything less would interfere with dignity nia-smug

  source

  • Assian_Candor@hexbear.net ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    honk whose dignity

    source