Anything less would interfere with dignity nia-smug
Comment on Gender-specific toilets to be required in non-residential buildings in England
CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 6 months ago
Wait what if the building is a small shop that has a singular room with a toilet and sink in it? The little bookstore near my house only has 1 water closet. Those type of stores will be illegal to build from now on?
Yor@hexbear.net 6 months ago
Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 6 months ago
Barabas@hexbear.net 6 months ago
That would be a ‘universal’ toilet and thus allowed.
Adkml@hexbear.net 6 months ago
God these people are fucking stupid.
That’s a gender neutral bathroom.
It doesn’t mean there’s a stripper pole and a doctor handing out hormones.
Barabas@hexbear.net 6 months ago
The thing they’re against is communal handwashing apparently.
Wolfman86@hexbear.net 6 months ago
Well…that’s where it starts.
Yor@hexbear.net 6 months ago
This honestly feels like a bit at this point
mynachmadarch@kbin.social 6 months ago
Wait, your bathrooms don't have a doctor handing out shots hanging around in the corner?
Emperor@feddit.uk 6 months ago
Wait, your bathrooms don’t have stripper poles?
llamajester421@kbin.social 6 months ago
What boggles me is that the latter "universal toilet" is what most conservatives ferociously battled when it is called a "gender neutral bathroom", like disabled bathrooms and residential ones. Face=palm.