I’ve asked GPT4 to write specific Python programs, and more often than not it does a good job. And if the program is incorrect I can tell it about the error and it will often manage to fix it for me.
Comment on Rabbit R1 AI box revealed to just be an Android app
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 weeks agoAn LLM has never generated a correct answer to any of my queries.
magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 2 weeks ago
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I don’t believe you
FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
You have every right not to, but the “useless” word comes out a lot when talking about LLMs and code, and we’re not all arguing in bad faith. The reliability problem is still a strong factor in why people don’t use this more, and, even if you buy into the hype, it’s probably a good idea to temper your expectations and try to walk a mile in the other person’s shoes. You might get to use LLMs and learn a thing or two.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I only “believe the hype” because a good developer friend of mine suggested I try copilot so I did and was impressed. It’s an amazing technical achievement that helps me get my job done. It’s useful every single day I use it. Does it do my job for me? No of fucking course not, I’m not a moron who expected that to begin with. It speeds up small portions of tasks and if I don’t understand or agree with its solution, it’s insanely easy not to use it.
People online mad about something new is all this is. There are valid concerns about this kind of tech, but I rarely see that. Ignorance on the topic prevails. Anyone calling ai “useless” in a blanket statement is necessarily ignorant and doesn’t really deserve my time except to catch a quick insult for being the ignorant fool they have revealed themselves to be.
FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
I’m glad that you’re finding this useful. When I say it’s useless, I speak in my name only.
I’m not afraid to try it out, and I actually did, and, while I was impressed by the quality of the English it spits out, I was disappointed with the actual substance of the answers, which makes this completely unusable for me in my day to day life. I keep trying it every now and then, but it’s not a service I would pay for in its current state.
Thing is, I’m not the only one. This is the opinion of the majority of people I work with, senior or junior. I’m willing to give it some time to mature, but I’m unconvinced at the moment.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
OK
iAmTheTot@kbin.social 2 weeks ago
That seems unlikely, unless "any" means two.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Perhaps the problem is that I never bothered to ask anything trivial enough, but you’d think that two rhyming words starting with 'L" would be simple.
TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 2 weeks ago
That might be because of how it works under the hood and how it tokenized words, characters, and sentences. It may not have anything telling it that a specific word starts with a specific letter. It might only have the whole word. That's my guess.
CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
“AI” is a really dumb term for what we’re all using currently. General LLMs are not intelligent, it’s assigning priorities to tokens (words) in a database, based on what tokens were provided before it, to compare and guess the next most logical word and phrase, really really fast. Informed guesses, sure, but there’s not enough parameters to consider all the factors required to identify a rhyme.
That said, honestly I’m struggling to come up with 2 rhyming L words? Lol even rhymebrain is failing me. I’m curious what you went with.
MxM111@kbin.social 2 weeks ago
Ok, by asking you mean that you find somewhere questions that someone identified as being answered wrongly by LLM, and asking yourself.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Nope.