Comment

Comment on California can share your baby's DNA sample without permission, but new bill could force state to publicly reveal who they're giving it to

<- View Parent

BertramDitore@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

Oy. Data this sensitive and useful should not require an active deletion request, especially from brand-new parents. It should be automatically deleted after a certain amount of time since it involves the protection of entire families, even those not directly involved with the newborn.

I was more or less agreeing with you before, but why do you get to decide what I’m mad about? Sorry, but I’m going to continue voicing my opinion.

source

Sort:hotnew top

KevonLooney@lemm.ee ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I’m saying that you had “no idea” about something that’s been around for a long time. Maybe you should look into the details (pro and con) before becoming enraged. People in CA have known about this and they’re not that upset, just asking for more transparency.

You are falling victim to today’s ragebait media, which is a larger issue. You may be correct but I’m telling you to not jump to conclusions without doing some research into it.

source
- gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  
  Maybe you should look into the details (pro and con) before becoming enraged.
  
  And maybe you should try some basic reading comprehension, ey?
  
  Data this sensitive and useful should not require an active deletion request
  
  source