Also did you look at the instances in question yourself?
No. I’m operating under the principle that anything that I have to experience by going elsewhere practically proves that it isn’t causing a problem here.
You are aware that defederating from an instance won’t stop individual users from that instance joining yours?
If defederation causes objectionable people that would otherwise leave the remaining network alone to – because they were defederated – to come here and everywhere and not leave other instances alone, then the best move from the network’s perspective is to remain federated. Right?
seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
What do you think the paradox of tolerance is? The reason why I ask is because it’s commonly misunderstood, because the quote explaining it is taken out of context.
aes@beehaw.org 1 year ago
If you believe I used the term incorrectly please say so. As it stands you’re coming off as someone who knows a thing, and wants everyone else to know they know.
seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
I don’t know if you used the term incorrectly or not, because I can’t read your mind. It could either mean “You are naive like the paradox of tolerance warns us about” or “You are naive like the paradox of tolerance is”.
The paradox is explicated by Karl Popper as
When quoting this, people always use the first two sentences, but leave out the third.
aes@beehaw.org 1 year ago
First case; you cannot counter the intolerant philosophies seen on these instances using rational argument as they do not appeal to rational thought. And because of this, not despite it, public opinion allows inhumane indignities to be acted upon marginalised demographics.