Comment on Allegedly*
ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Fun fact; under common law you legally can’t slander / libel the dead.
The fucker definitely did it.
Comment on Allegedly*
ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Fun fact; under common law you legally can’t slander / libel the dead.
The fucker definitely did it.
Num10ck@lemmy.world 5 months ago
well theres a reasonable chance that his son did it and OJ tried to cover it up… but since OJ’s professional career was based on head injuries i personally doubt it.
IGuessThisIsForNSFW@yiffit.net 5 months ago
I had never heard this theory prior to his death, but now I see it popping up here and there. Is there any evidence to support this? I still think he probably did it, but I’m curious as to why people are saying this now.
Num10ck@lemmy.world 5 months ago
his son was a chef and had military knife training and had attacked an ex gf with similar knife. also had a history of drugs. OJ comes off as more a gun/muscle kind of problem solver.
The watch cap found at the scene was the kind the son wore. dog hair on the scene, son owned a dog and oj did not. sons alibi was very weak. sons vehicle was bloodied not the bronco. the glove fit the son.
Axiochus@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Any sources for these claims?
tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 5 months ago
But motive?
IGuessThisIsForNSFW@yiffit.net 5 months ago
Thanks for posting this! I also googled it (It took like 10 seconds, not sure why we’re expecting so much of you below) and saw they’re are a lot of people talking about it. I don’t know how much stock I put in it personally, but it’s an interesting theory that I knew nothing about prior.
WarmSoda@lemm.ee 5 months ago
It was floating around during the trial too. No one took it seriously back then either.