Anti vax as in? People rightful opposed being forced to take a shot proven to not stop the spread, if that’s what you mean
Comment on The Reddit Protest Is Finally Over. Reddit Won.
Hyperi0n@lemmy.film 1 year agoDiscord isn’t owned or majority controlled by tencent at all. That’s antivax level paranoia.
exapsy@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Tencent owns a majority of the shares. If you want to dispute me, at least throw a source … it’s a well known fact in the business community.
Crunchbase - Principal investors
Crunchbase - Series B Lead investors (Tencent, Benchmark, 9+ Program)
Hyperi0n@lemmy.film 1 year ago
You just claimed that out of your ass again. There isn’t a single source that says tencent has a majority stake from their investment with Discord Inc.
Not even the links you provided state what you are claiming.
Tencent owns a majority stake in GGG.
Tencent has only funded Discord for $158 million. Less than 1/3 of the total funding($500 million) it has received and well below the $15 billion the company is valued at.
Either you don’t know how investments and shares work, you’re bad at math or both.
Is most likely that tencent has a 10-15% stake in Discord.
exapsy@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
“Tencent has only funded 158 million” and that’s not a majority of the shares? Are you stupid or you’re pretending to be? Because so far you’ve only insulted me but now it’s time for me to insult you. You firstly clearly don’t know how to make a discussion work without insulting your counterparty, and secondly don’t know in english the difference between “THE majority” and “A majority”.
You talk like a classic 9gagger who only knows how to talk with insults and misinformation. 1/3 is a majority of the shares. That’s how it works in business. 1/3 is a big number to take big decisions and make vetos and be on the table.
Hyperi0n@lemmy.film 1 year ago
1/3 is not the majority. Majority of share has to be 50% and more. Usually majority is kept by the company and other shares are promised.
Investing doesn’t gauentee stakeholdership. You are making nothing but conspitorial assumptions.
Again, you have little grasp on economics, buisness, math and stakeholders.
JesusFistus@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Depending on when that funding came in and how the stocks got priced they could be majority shareholders, the founders of the company I work for own over 50% together although they’ve gotten way more funding from external investors than they’ve put in themselves