Comment

Comment on Google mocks Epic’s proposed reforms to end Android app market monopoly

ozymandias117@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

Any idea how this demand is different from the current state of Android?

Under Epic’s terms, any app downloaded from anywhere would operate identically to apps downloaded from Google Play, without Google imposing any unnecessary distribution fees. Similarly, developers would be able to provide their own in-app purchasing options and inform users of out-of-app purchasing options, without having to use Google’s APIs or paying Google additional fees.

Last time I used it, I downloaded all my apps through F-Droid, and I didn’t think they were paying Google anything?

source

Sort:hotnew top

atocci@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
They probably mean, for example, not having to prompt the user to allow installs from “unknown sources”, allowing alternative app stores to update apps and themselves automatically in the background like Google Play does, allow installations from alternative stores with one tap without extra user interaction, etc.

source
- ozymandias117@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  I must have had an extension at the time, but it sounds like F-Droid does automatic updates for anything Android 12+ now?
  
  f-droid.org/de/2024/02/01/twif.html
  
  I guess the nag screen can be scary, though. Good point
  
  source
  - huginn@feddit.it ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    The nag screen is important for a bunch of less technically literate people who would otherwise install malware without thinking twice.
    
    Or even once.
    
    source
    ozymandias117@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    I really don’t know how to feel about it
    
    The people it’s intended to protect will just click “yes” to anything in my experience
    
    I don’t have a statistical analysis of results over a normal distribution of the world population, though
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - AeroLemming@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    I just tested it by updating something and it didn’t work, so I would say no, we don’t have background updates on F-Droid.
    
    source
le_saucisson_masquay@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
There are differences between play store and other store. For instance, on fdroid you have a pop up asking each and every time if you want to install or update the app after pressing install button. Play store you just click install and let it do its work in the background.

I don’t think fdroid can update app by itself in the background. Play store can.

I mean third party store doesn’t have access to some of the api play store have, things you don’t care but that is important to normies and that would induce reduced profit from epic store.

source
- MonkderDritte@feddit.de ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  You don’t have that popup on NeoStore and other alternatives, because they use Android’s new APIs. F-Droid (the app) somehow gets nowhere.
  
  source
  - T156@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    F-Droid has allegedly had automatic/silent installs for a while now, although only on newer versions of Android (12+).
    
    source
  - le_saucisson_masquay@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    I used droid-ify recently, which is well maintained and still got these pop up. Are you sure we’re talking about the same thing ? I mean pop up that says « would you like to install x app ». Yes no. And you got to give permission to the store first to even show this pop up.
    
    source
    tb_@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Updates specifically, initial install still gives the pop-up.
    
    source
RobotToaster@mander.xyz ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
In addition to what atocci said, apps not downloaded from an app store by default have limitations on their access to accessibility services.

source
- ozymandias117@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Huh. That’s a weird restriction that definitely gives credence to their case
  
  Are accessibility services only part of Google Play and not AOSP…?
  
  source
  - FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Things like screen reader access have huge potential uses by malware. Generally it should not be trivial for a program to get that level of access to everything you do.
    
    source
    ozymandias117@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    The restriction of being limited to Google Play and not other app stores implies the implementation is part of Google Play Services, and not included in AOSP
    
    So I was curious if that’s how it’s implemented on Android - I know Google loves moving features out of AOSP
    
    However, things like Android-Password-Store used Accessibility services through F-Droid for autotyping back when I used it
    
    So, trying to understand what has been locked down, since I’m planning on going back to GrapheneOS
    
    source
    -> View More Comments