pixxelkick@lemmy.world 2 months ago
This is already to some degree an existing dilemma. There are already individuals out there who, due to genetic lottery, happen to have an adult body that through some efforts of clothing, makeup, hairstyle, etc, can very much present themselves as substantially younger looking than their actual age.
Lord knows certain popular niches in the porn industry make this apparant… >_>;
And from what I have heard on social media, sometimes these individuals couple up with another person who… doesnt look substantially younger.
And often, these couples face quite a bit of controversy and social stigma, despite everything they are doing and into being 100% legal and, from am objective standpoint, ethically fine (they are two consenting adults after all)
But I agree that future tech with things like gene editing and whatnot this dilemma will certainly become substantially more pronounced and I think it will likely be yet another group being attacked for daring to live their lives.
UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 2 months ago
The upvote/downvote ratio for this post scares me already.
Mesophar@lemm.ee 2 months ago
The reason for the ratio is because this is very close to a pedophilia apologist viewpoint blurring the lines between attraction and consent. If they are an adult with the body of a twelve year old, why would another adult be sexually attracted to them (their body)? At what point is the line between respecting an individual’s autonomy to present as a minor, and sexually objectifying actual minors?
But that is why the downvotes. Because it is very easy to read the original post as “nah, it’s not pedophilia, they’re technically legal!”
UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 2 months ago
I don’t understand. Do pedophile apologists say that consent isn’t necessary if one is attracted to kids or something? Like those rape defenders who invoke nature to say “rape happens in animals, hence there is nothing immoral about rape in humans”?. Sorry if I come off as a little dense. I am unaware of this viewpoint (in fact, I’ve never really discussed about this topic with anyone before).
Cuz they’re likely a pedophile. But this wouldn’t be immoral as the other party has all the knowledge and experience of a consenting adult.
I imagine that minors are sexually objectified either ways. Like… A pedophile probably thinks of some kid while masturbating, no? How’s that different from having sex with an adult who looks like a kid?
But that is what it is a little, no? Forget legality, I’m talking more on morality grounds. According to my definition of pedophilia, you would still be a pedophile if u were attracted to kid-like people. But in this case, consensual sex would be permissible as no damage is being done to anyone (as both parties can consent).
pixxelkick@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I find it weird how much people give a shit about what consenting adults do for pleasure in the comfort of their own homes, and to their own bodies.
If they are an adult, it’s their body and their choice.
And if their choice is to cosplay as a child and bang an older person because that’s what gets their rocks off, I really don’t care.
It’s honestly not even the most outlandish of fetishes I’ve seen. We got people out there that orgasm from popping balloons, eating shit, and getting kicked in the crotch.
UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 2 months ago
WHAT. I wanna see porn of that lmao. Like… Do they moan n stuff when they hear balloons popping? Or would they orgasm after hearing gunfire considering that sounds similar sometimes? Would they be horny constantly in a warzone??? I have so many questions…