Exactly. They wanted to highlight the dumb “sleeper” line for some reason, even though it’s probably the least newsworthy part of the message. “Geek Squad faces huge layoffs, members call it ‘going sleeper’” is much clearer but still a waste of time and space.
Comment on Best Buy Geek Squad Agents ‘Going Sleeper’ After Mass Layoffs
exanime@lemmy.today 7 months agoThe headline is stupid … It basically says Geek Squad is laid off after getting laid off
Journalism is basically beyond saving at this point…
EvilBit@lemmy.world 7 months ago
exanime@lemmy.today 7 months ago
By today’s journalism standards, you are ready for Chief Editor!
EvilBit@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I’m very good at wasting time and space effectively.
exanime@lemmy.today 7 months ago
Hey I just downed a big bag of sour gummies and popcorn watching movies at home… If I keep this up I’ll challenge anyone for more wasted space!
Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 7 months ago
I mean, it’s basically a no name website. It’s not like this is a NYTimes, AP, or The Atlantic headline.
hansl@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Overreacting and dramatization is what social media trained us to do, so I’ll go ahead and answer that question with… no, probably not. Or as social media taught me; I SLAM your comment DOWN!
dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I clap back at your slamming of the previous poster’s comment.
exanime@lemmy.today 7 months ago
If this were an isolated example, sure… But go to all those sources you mentioned and tell me how many times some “slammed” someone else…
Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 7 months ago
Okay … Let’s google it … I’m open to be being bias checked; The Atlantic and NY Times.
Some “The Atlantic” examples:
Some “NYTimes” examples:
What’s your point exactly? These aren’t (IMO) atrocious headlines; I suppose a few could be more informative for sure but also these are like ~1 per year.
exanime@lemmy.today 7 months ago
Nice malicious compliance bud…
You don’t have to agree with me but #1 pretending my entire point was based on this one bad headline was miscengenous at best… #2 again taking the comment literally simply to discard it = miscengenous
Not really into trying to debate a bad faith partner here