Comment on After 114 days of change, Broadcom CEO acknowledges VMware-related “unease”
SupraMario@lemmy.world 7 months agoThat’s interesting, because hosting anything in the cloud is usually way more expensive than on prem. We just pulled a large number of our systems back out of gcp because of it.
BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 7 months ago
Well that was my point, moving to the cloud requires drastic changes in the way your infra works. You cannot have full fledged VMs running at 10% of capacity 95% of the time like you do on prem. You need to be able to scale up and down on a whim with containers/micro services/whatever you call it. I’ve worked with a lot of companies that never understood that and bitterly regretted moving to the cloud.
ramble81@lemm.ee 7 months ago
Yup. I’ve seen companies that wanted to “get to the cloud” and didn’t want to spend any money on redeveloping their systems so it turned into a lift-and-shift which just drove their costs up.
Restaldt@lemm.ee 7 months ago
Hey hey my company is doing exactly this right now
“Get EVERYTHING OFF PREM. SEND ALL OF IT TO GCP NOW”
AA5B@lemmy.world 7 months ago
My company just came to their sense on this. We demonstrated one product worked well in the cloud by completely re-architecting it? It was a two year project. However then management was all hung ho, and set an extremely aggressive deadline, meaning lift and shift was the only possibility. However just before the new year, management finally realized just how expensive it was going to be, and changed their mind
SupraMario@lemmy.world 7 months ago
O absolutely, but most of these companies don’t want to spend money to actually get to that point since they’re going to have to redev their applications and design, so they just tell the engineers to put everything one to one in the cloud.