I’m more surprised that a for-profit company is willing to use a technology that is able to randomly spew out unwanted content, incorrect information, or just straight gibberish, in any kind of public facing capacity.
Oh, it let them save money on support staff this quarter. And fixing it can be an actionable OKR for next quarter. Nevermind.
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 months ago
No one’s going after hammer manufacturers because their hammers don’t self-destruct if you try to use one to clobber someone over the head.
pufferfischerpulver@feddit.de 8 months ago
True, but people generally understand hammers. Llms? Not so much
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 months ago
No one’s going after computer manufacturers or OS vendors because people use computers to commit cybercrime. I doubt most people could explain how an OS or motherboard works.
Akrenion@programming.dev 8 months ago
A lot of poluticians want hardwarelevel backdoors. It’s been declared unconstitutional quite some times in different countries but they are trying.
General_Effort@lemmy.world 8 months ago
A better example would be something like The Anarchist Cookbook. Possession is illegal in some places.