Comment

Comment on Automakers Are Sharing Consumers’ Driving Behavior With Insurance Companies

Akasazh@feddit.nl ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

They should confirm to gdpr rules. Ofc they can collect data, but they certainly can’t sell that personalized info to my car insurer, fi.

Sort:hotnew top

fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
pro.bloomberglaw.com/…/privacy-laws-us-vs-eu-gdpr…

GDPR is opt out, so you wouldn’t get any benefit until you complain. Plus:

(GDPR) excludes “pseudonymised” data

source
- Akasazh@feddit.nl ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  
  GDPR is opt out, so you wouldn’t get any benefit until you complain. Plus:
  
  Not really I must consent to an unambigious statement before data may be processed.
  
  gdpr.eu/gdpr-consent-requirements/
  
  (GDPR) excludes “pseudonymised” data
  
  Thats a bit too broad of a statement:
  
  Anonymization and pseudonymization are still considered as “data processing” under the GDPR—therefore, companies must still comply with Article 5(1)(b)’s “purpose limitation” before attempting either data minimization technique.
  
  While truly “anonymized” data does not, by definition, fall within the scope of the GDPR, complying with the definition is so rigorous that a data controller should be extremely cautious before attempting to use anonymization as a way to circumvent the GDPR completely.
  
  Source: morganlewis.com/…/the-edata-guide-to-gdpr-anonymi…
  
  source