But the battery pack is far and away more expensive than the engine. Shit far and away more expensive than the engine AND transmission. Shit like half an EVs price is the battery.
An electric motor is SIGNIFICANTLY more simple to produce than an entire internal combustion engine. There are far fewer moving parts on an electric car than a gasoline one.
The battery is a significant cost, but not all cars need to have 300 miles of range. It is also possible that once the market is saturated (i.e. - several decades), that recycled battery packs will be cheaper to produce than batteries built from raw materials.
The major reason why electric cars are so expensive right now is because there are far fewer of them, and the ones that are being made have a target market of an upper-middle class household. They’re luxury/status symbols as much as anything else. Secondarily, there isn’t a large used electric car market yet.
There is a large potential for cost reductions. Assuming technology continues to improve, electric cars will drop below the price of gas and diesel for everyday driving. Internal combustion engines will most likely be reduced to specialty vehicles.
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Yeah, it’s about the price of a full engine and transmission replacement for an internal combustion car.
Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Also, as we realize that we don’t need 400+ miles of range in a commuter car, cheaper battery chemistries make a lot of sense, despite their shorter range per kg or lb
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Most people want a car that can do everything they need a car to do. As otherwise they have to buy a SECOND car that can perform the jobs the first car can’t. At that point people look at their finances and wonder why they have the first car at all, that first car has a monthly payment, insurance, and repairs. It would be so much cheaper to ditch it and just have the car that performs all the functions.
gregorum@lemm.ee 9 months ago
In that case, why not just have no car at all and use a bike or public transit and rent a car when you really need one?
st3ph3n@midwest.social 9 months ago
The feasibility of that will be highly variable depending on where you live. Much of America is a public transit desert.
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Car rentals are expensive and time consuming affairs. This ‘solution’ is worse for the vast majority of people than owning a car. It’s why you don’t see people doing it.
toni_bmw@lemmy.world 9 months ago
There are countless things that can’t be done without a car, even when you are a certain age or care for older family members. The reasoning of living without a car in property, in my humble opinion, is only valid at a certain time in life
dan1101@lemm.ee 9 months ago
If I buy an EV I would like it to do 400 miles, but I don’t need 0-60 in 3 seconds.
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Low 0-60 times are inherent to EVs. There’s no transmission and the motor has a wide efficiency area. It’s basically hard to make a non dual motor EV accelerate slowly. Single motor ones aren’t quick, but you won’t get AWD if that’s a thing you desire.
Oderus@lemmy.world 9 months ago
It’s easy to make a less powerful motor. As someone else said, the current market is for people who are looking for better performance and aren’t concerned with price. I put a deposit on a Polestar 3 that does 0-60 in 4.7s which is slow compared to its competition like the Model X and BMW iX but I don’t care about 0-60. It’s a meaningless metric to judge a car by. My Challenger SRT 392 does the 0-60 in 4.2s but I bought that car for how nice it looks, not its 0-60.
Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 9 months ago
I think trim packages or settings in the car that trade acceleration for range make a lot of sense.
BakerBagel@midwest.social 9 months ago
That’s not really how electric motors work though. They spin up crazy fast, which means fast 0-60 times. Think about an electric mixer in your kitchen; it takes more or less the the same amount of time for it get up to speed weather it’s on the highest setting or the lowest setting since the motor is the only moving part. There is no fancy gearing to vary the speeds, it’s based solely on the amount of energy being put into the system.
MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 9 months ago
Ye canna change the laws of physics! Acceleration is proportional to force exerted (F=ma) and has nothing to do with the amount of energy stored, which gives you range. You might get a few percent efficiency bonus from lesser acceleration due to losses (so 2-3 extra Km per 100), but you can’t “trade acceleration for range”