Firefox is open source, bullshit can be excised if necessary
Comment on Google gets its way, bakes a user-tracking ad platform directly into Chrome
snownyte@kbin.social 1 year ago
We're in a lose/lose scenario here. Google has been inserting ad-tracking and soon will be nuking ad-blockers.
Then you've got Firefox wanting to implement AI soon at the cost of employees.
Is there really anywhere else we can go before both of their shit hits the fan?
Damage@feddit.it 1 year ago
calzone_gigante@lemmy.eco.br 1 year ago
Maintaining a browser is crazy hard. If Firefox goes to shit, it would require some serious foundation to maintain a good fork.
Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Yes, and expensive. This is often overlooked when people just say don’t worry it’s FOSS. The enshitification happens slowly, and by the time there is outrage about how bad it becomes the last non intrusive fork might be several years old and take even more work to modernize. I’m not giving up all hope, but you are correct, it would be a very ambitious community undertaking to keep such a thing competitive with the plethora of evil browsers out there.
Damage@feddit.it 1 year ago
I chose my wording accurately, I never mentioned maintaining the whole browser
Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Librewolf
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 year ago
We need a federated browser.
cosmic_slate@dmv.social 1 year ago
[deleted]deleted@lemmy.world 1 year ago
WE NEED A FEDERATED BROWSER.
SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Like Tor?
Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
TOR is a forked Firefox.
GustavoFring@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You mean Tor Browser specifically.
ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Firefox needs to ship with IPFS & IPNS built in, then we’d have a Distributed web. Which is I think what you’re asking for maybe?
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Sure, lets do that.
smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
HTTP?
comador@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Opera, Vivaldi and Brave are descent alternatives.
Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
No. No they aren’t.
s0ckpuppet@kbin.social 1 year ago
Brave is shady af and iirc Opera got bought by some Chinese spyware company.
comador@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I only listed Opera b/c Vivaldi is based on it:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivaldi_(web_browser)
Vivaldi is absolutely a descent FOSS product, but will agree with the Opera sentiment and have edited my post more accordingly.
LunchEnjoyer@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’d argue Firefox is the descent alternative.
- Opera is Crappy Chinese ad-filled browser
- Vivaldi, although it’s extremely nice tab management system and unique features, isn’t open source. But probably the better chromium browser of the owns you mentioned.
- Brave… Is a crypto shilling browser run by a turd wanting to ban same sex marriage
There are a plethora of sources out there of good reasons not to use these browsers. But seriously, Firefox is an excellent browser, treat yourself to better privacy 🦊
comador@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I only listed Opera because Vivaldi’s based on it, but that’s about where it ends. Vivaldi and FF are the only two I use tbh.
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Each of which depend on chrome and google’s decisions.
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Idk why you’re being downvoted. All of these browsers are chromium browsers.
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I don’t think we should equate Firefox’s AI plans with other ones.
Firefox’s AI will be trained entirely locally with data that you choose to give it, and won’t send any information back to Firefox.
By the sounds of it it won’t be a chatbot either, but rather an aid for finding more sources, pointing out fake reviews, assisting in translation, etc.
My two main issues with “AI” are unethically sourced training data, and hoovering up personal information when you use it. Neither are a problem for Mozilla’s “AI” plans.