Are you a troll or genuinely just an absolutely miserable person? Since when did Lemmy’s comments turn like that of Instagram?
Comment on DeepMind’s New AI Beats Billion Dollar Systems - For Free!
willya@lemmyf.uk 10 months ago
Horrible video. God awful voice.
UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 10 months ago
MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 10 months ago
You’re right. we shouldn’t resort to ad hominems here.
If that video is yours, i must admit though, that you might want to work on your cadence and inflection a bit, otherwise it is difficult to listen for the whole video. The video itself was interesting, I already had read, that lambda was used and was at least partially more effective than classical models. Question is how it will fare when the data it was trained on becomes less relevant as weather patterns change in the future due to climate change.
UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 10 months ago
If that video is yours
Naah I ain’t the guy hehe. Just someone who likes his vids and who liked this vid specifically.
Question is how it will fare when the data it was trained on becomes less relevant as weather patterns change in the future due to climate change.
Hmm that is to be seen.
willya@lemmyf.uk 10 months ago
I’m pretty miserable, but it just came off as one of the many AI generated videos with the weird voices making my skin crawl more than kid oriented YouTube shorts.
UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Right… But in this assumption of yours, you just attacked THE VOICE of a real guy. Something that is so fundamental to one’s identity… So many people have insecurities about themselves, which may also include their voice. Not nice to just randomly shoot someone down cuz u were angry today, eh?
MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 10 months ago
No need to get personal here
technojamin@lemmy.world 10 months ago
TwoMinutePapers is a well-established YouTube channel that does a great job of explaining new scientific techniques/advancements (usually in the areas of computer science and graphics). Do you actually have anything to say about the content of the video?
AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I can understand why some viewers would have a negative reaction: it’s like listening to an overexcited sports commentator paraphrase the paper’s abstract and speculate about its impact, without really trying to explain the content. The value for those who follow the channel would presumably come from its discrimination in selecting significant papers and accuracy in summarizing them, but that’s not apparent to a first-time viewer.