Comment on Sony misses PS5 sales target as console enters ‘latter stage of its life cycle’
umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 months agoThat explains it. It was a bad time to buy both pcs and consoles. If you are talking MSRP, sure, but the PS5 was heavily inflated at that time too and sometimes still is. That’s if you were lucky to be able to even buy the thing. Consoles also tend to be much more cost effective vs PCs at launch, this is probably the crux of the issue here.
Even then I still can’t find any console in my country for cheaper than a comparable PC, and the PC will last longer than a console generation. I put this and the fact I’ll need a PC anyway when doing my cost analysis. I also factor in game cost, and PSN, and such.
As I said I acknowledge its not as cheap as before, but so do pretty much all hardware now, and maybe this is different in the US, but you don’t need a 2k GPU, period. A fraction of that will get you console level performance.
But lets rewind a bit, If a 960 can run TLOU and hogwarts legacy, a 1660 should very much still run any game you throw at it, even at reduced settings. What kind of problems do you have with games not running? Did a new, very heavy game came out that I’m not aware of?
Maybe its a simple thing you can easily fix and be able to use it?
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Yes the crux of the issue is that it’s currently a bad time to buy PCs and a great time to buy consoles.
I think your issue is that you’re more than a little out of touch with reality. You can’t even get a 2070 for $200 or less, how would you get something better lmao.
A 960 only satisfies the minimum requirements for Hogwarts Legacy. It can literally barely run the game at all. The way to fix the performance of a 1660 ti is to replace it with a better card, that will cost hundreds of dollars. Or I can just buy the same games in the PS5 that will run them flawlessly and continue to do so for a number of years with the money I already spent. Once again it’s a no brainer.
umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 months ago
I’m exemplifying an old card (960) that run much newer games well because you just didn’t elaborate how your 1660 is so bad. I don’t see how any game woudn’t run on it that soon.
And cards are not that expensive anymore. At least not here. A sub-$200 card can definetly be had that supercedes a 2070.
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 7 months ago
But it doesn’t run much newer games well at all. You listed two games as examples and one of them it doesn’t even meet the minimum requirements. The other one it barely meets. You’ve literally proved yourself wrong.
They are still very expensive here in the US, and they don’t drop much in price after they age. If I go on Newegg right now and filter GPUs to $200 or less the best Nvidia card on offer is a 3050. A generation newer but two models below the 2070. You’re just making things up to prove your point but everything you say is just verifiably false lol. It’s like you’ve been thawed out of a block of ice after being frozen for 6 years and you’re not adapting well to your new reality.
And yes, it’s objectively not worth it unless you specifically want a gaming PC. If you’re in a position where you’re comparing a gaming PC and a console though, dollar for dollar, console wins.