Comment

Comment on Bluesky and Mastodon users are having a fight that could shape the next generation of social media

Hmm atprotocol has 1 server and 1 product. How is it competing with other decentralized protocols by not having anything to show? All I’m saying that it’s not a real competition yet especially since Bluesky is literally just the worst parts of Twitter without anything done to address the same toxic shit that came out of the original.

source

Sort:hotnew top

nix@merv.news ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Its barely been around. How many services did activitypub have the first year? Atprotocol already has tools twitter didnt have to combat the bad shit. The block tool is way more powerful and theres block lists, theres custom feeds instead of toxic for you page that pushes ads and inflammatory posts.

source
- drmoose@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  You just can’t compare these two directly - ActivityPub which is a W3 backed non-profit free protocol and software collection to Bluesky which is a for profit american product with some open source components that could be decentralized. But even if you do, it’s still underperforming despite being found directly to leech of users of an existing failing product (it’s even the same founder lol).
  
  Again, you can like Bluesky and atprotocol but to say it’s on even remotely equal footing either in ideological or real sense to be “fighting activititypub” is just laughable any way you look at it.
  
  source
  - cosmic_slate@dmv.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    What do you mean “underperforming”? That’s just head-in-sand nonsense.
    
    Basically 3/4th of the number of active Mastodon users signed up for Bluesky within the last few days.
    
    source
Carighan@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Well, 1 effective server. I would sure hope it actually runs on more than 1 for redundancy/latency reasons.

source
- haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  The server isnt effective by itself. Marketing and money to pay developers is. In comparison to mastodons completely open source approach, the proprietary bluesky software is a step back to the old ways. Its a public benefit llc which I can appreciate but it feels like someone wanted to show people that proprietary is always better. I‘m not a fan.
  
  source