Comment on How does employing a rapist not constitute an unsafe work environment for female employees?
curiousaur@reddthat.com 4 months agoNo they didn’t.
Comment on How does employing a rapist not constitute an unsafe work environment for female employees?
curiousaur@reddthat.com 4 months agoNo they didn’t.
Quitmuch1938@lemmy.world 4 months ago
curiousaur@reddthat.com 4 months ago
It did not say it’s not rape. Rape is a criminal term to be used in criminal court. Sexual Assault is the civil court term for rape. He was not punished, he was sued.
What college did you go to kiddo? You seem real dim.
Quitmuch1938@lemmy.world 4 months ago
curiousaur@reddthat.com 4 months ago
No part of that says he did not do it, which is your claim. Are you illiterate?
dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 months ago
Right, how do you think he sexually assaulted her 30 years ago? They didn’t have the evidence to support full blown penetrative rape because any fluids or internal damage to her body would have long been healed over or ejected. The SA liability came with an $83.3M price tag. Do you get slapped with a punishment like that for grabbing a boob?
Quitmuch1938@lemmy.world 4 months ago
in4aPenny@lemmy.world 4 months ago
You could win this argument if only you could link a reference to your sources. It’s not up to us to look up evidence for your claims, it’s up to you to provide evidence for your argument.