Comment on How does employing a rapist not constitute an unsafe work environment for female employees?

• curiousaur@reddthat.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  No they didn’t.

  source

  • Quitmuch1938@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    [deleted]

    source

    • curiousaur@reddthat.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It did not say it’s not rape. Rape is a criminal term to be used in criminal court. Sexual Assault is the civil court term for rape. He was not punished, he was sued.

      What college did you go to kiddo? You seem real dim.

      source

      • Quitmuch1938@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        [deleted]

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Right, how do you think he sexually assaulted her 30 years ago? They didn’t have the evidence to support full blown penetrative rape because any fluids or internal damage to her body would have long been healed over or ejected. The SA liability came with an $83.3M price tag. Do you get slapped with a punishment like that for grabbing a boob?

      source

      • Quitmuch1938@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        [deleted]

        source

        • -> View More Comments