They’re less than shutting down. Funimation was where these shows are. Sony owns Funimation, and funimation bought crunchyroll. Funimation is switching their name to crunchyroll because it has more positive name recognition.
So funimation is essentially claiming that Funimation purchases will be null and void after funimation chooses to change its name to crunchyroll.
Also, since crunchy and fun were competitors and they were allowed to buy themselves into a near monopoly, they’re upping the subscription prices.
empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 months ago
The secret is that despite everything on the website saying “buy” to the end user when they’re putting in their credit card information, somewhere 18 pages down in the TOS you agree to when making an account there is a provision that they reserve the right to revoke access at any time. It’s not truly owning content, it was never YOUR contract. It’s theirs.
grue@lemmy.world 7 months ago
The secret isn’t that the fine print somehow makes it okay.
The secret is that it really is blatantly illegal false advertising, but the regulatory-captured FTC isn’t doing it’s damn job and the companies know it.
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 7 months ago
The courts should not tolerate hidden clauses in pages of legalese that literally no one, not even lawyers read. If you have a misleading claim advertised that the buyer is more likely to see, then your hidden clause is invalidated.
lolcatnip@reddthat.com 7 months ago
Yeah, I don’t see why they tolerate it. Judges are people too and they know damn well that people can’t be expected to read every TOS they’re asked to agree to.