You’re correct in a lot of languages; Excel comes to mind. Just that’s not how int rand() works in C.
Sorry, I don’t why you’re getting snark and even being accused of using the word “integer”.
Comment on Me after I got fired
LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 10 months ago
But rand() is a number between 0-1, so it will never be >10
Basically this is just #define True = False
ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Xyre@lemmus.org 10 months ago
I’m not sure what’s worse. The engineer that thought this would work or the company that doesn’t do code reviews.
perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Pit it in a package they depend on - nobody reviews those
CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Pick a library you already use with many sub-dependencies. Make a new library with your evil code. Name it in line with the step 1 library. Oh hi there “Framework.Microsoft.Extensions.DB.Net.Compatibility” you couldn’t possibly have anything bad going on in you, plus you sound really boring to review, I’m sure it’s fine.
genfood@feddit.de 10 months ago
The C standard library function rand(void) returns a random integer between 0 and RAND_MAX (which should be at least 2^15, depending on the actual implementation).