Comment on ‘Zombie Offices’ Spell Trouble for Some Banks - The New York Times
notannpc@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Let those banks burn. I could not care less. Let the corporate real estate market burn with em.
We don’t need them.
Comment on ‘Zombie Offices’ Spell Trouble for Some Banks - The New York Times
notannpc@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Let those banks burn. I could not care less. Let the corporate real estate market burn with em.
We don’t need them.
leaskovski@kbin.social 11 months ago
You do know if that sector fails, so does your pension, and probably a whole load of the economy.
Drusas@kbin.social 11 months ago
Pension, lol. What is this, the fifties?
sunbeam60@lemmy.one 11 months ago
In the U.K. every employee have to have a pension by law.
1984@lemmy.today 11 months ago
Price of doing business. :)
No but seriously, it’s a bit annoying that these guys are holding everyone hostage in a way. If they don’t make bank, we all suffer? Seems wrong.
notgold@aussie.zone 11 months ago
It is bullshit that they want to hurt the masses instead of the bottom line taking a hit
Shalakushka@kbin.social 11 months ago
When were you born, 1950? Who the duck has a pension at this point?
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
I work IT on a union contract. I’m building a pension. My cousin retired at 48 from his union mechanic job and now makes 50% pay until he dies.
You should consider a union.
Passerby6497@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Where are you that it is unionized? Around me, any talk of unionization among my peers is always dismissed as something that would upset the gravy train and cause all our jobs to be offshored.
spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
I have a pension through work, and through the government.
AtariDump@lemmy.world 11 months ago
So you work for the government? One of the few to only sectors left in the USA with a pension.
leaskovski@kbin.social 11 months ago
When I got my first proper job at the turn of the century, it was the first thing I signed up to... A shitty stakeholder pension as my company was paying 8% into it
agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 11 months ago
Not really. The office market is not that huge and the vacancies overall are also not that bad. It’s not like every single office is suddenly empty.
On the flip side: where these offices are located, housing is extremely expensive, so you could transform some offices to apartments, pivot projects currently in construction and maybe even demolish some older buildings.
These headlines are just a sign that the current management class is utterly incapable of reacting to anything but “line go up”. They can’t understand that they can’t exploit their way out of this for once.
c0c0c0@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Turning office space into living space is often mentioned in discussions like this. It should be noted that converting the space is not as easy as it seems. In particular, moving the plumbing infrastructure to support individual bathrooms and kitchens is extremely challenging and it makes some projects impracticable.
agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 11 months ago
Some.
We’re not talking about total conversion of all office spaces. Even if just 5% of the vacant offices can be converted, that’s already 5% less office space to worry about. Let the market decide.
sunbeam60@lemmy.one 11 months ago
Didn’t you and I already debate this?
Your argument is no different than saying the stone chipping business will collapse because pesky bronze smelters are making swords.
A broad portfolio doesn’t have a particularly heavy real estate position. Maybe some state pension schemes are - I think you mentioned the Canadian one last one - but it’s not like the office buildings become worthless from one day to then other. Some will remain occupied offices, some will convert into residential accommodation. Others will get torn down and redeveloped. The economy will adapt.
phillaholic@lemm.ee 11 months ago
A collapse of the commercial real estate market would spill over to the larger market and most certainly impact any investments you have. We don’t really want banks to go under in big ways, it always ends up hurting the poor and middle class the most.
ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Given the overwhelming amount of debt the general public has, having the rich share the load and lose their shirts too would be nice. At this point there isn’t much left for us unmoneyed people and watching the system they rely on burn them as much as it hurts is is fine. Let the rich lose.
archomrade@midwest.social 11 months ago
It’s not really a ‘could’ spill over, it definitely would.
A very high proportion of institutional investment is tied up in CRE. If enough defaults happen it might even be worse than 2008.
Doesn’t mean we should tip the scales in favor of CRE or the banks, though. If it comes to pass, we should nationalize the assets and socialize retirement (more). If we didn’t have all our retirement accounts in private markets our exposure to this kind of error wouldn’t be so high.
leaskovski@kbin.social 11 months ago
Most probably... I don't know, but if we did, good shout and good memory 👍