Microsoft should have stuck with HoloLens
vox@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
it’s basically just hololens right?
also visionos is not the first “spatial os”, windows 10 was the first. (ever notice how stuff has circular glow effect around it? it’s supposed to show up around the pointer while using the os in vr/ar
VampyreOfNazareth@lemm.ee 1 year ago
excitingburp@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Hololens is slightly more advanced. At least the last I saw it uses waveguides etc. to overlay the content over a transparent panel. Much like Google glasses, but way, way more advanced (and therefore justifiably expensive). AVP is no different to a $300 Quest (plus internal cameras for iris and expression tracking) - it’s 10x Apple tax.
Hololens is still alive and kicking btw, but it’s exclusively enterprise.
deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Holyginz@lemmy.world 1 year ago
So refute the information then.
deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Keep deep throating that apple cock
VampyreOfNazareth@lemm.ee 1 year ago
VR is great porn
vox@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
HoloLens 2 was supposed to cost 3500$
also there were cheaper hololens-compatible headsets made by third parties at the time (not anymore)