Comment on Best Filesystem for NAS?

• atzanteol@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Wut? Ext4 is quite reliable.

  source
• possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’ve run btrfs for years and never had a issue. They one time my system wouldn’t boot it was due to a bad drive. I just swapped the drive and rebalanced and I was back up and running in less than a half an hour.

  source
• devfuuu@lemmy.world [bot] ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Corruption on power only regularly happened to me on xfs a few years ago. That made me swear to never use that fs ever again. Never seen it on my ext4fs systems which are all I have for years in multiple computers.

  source
• Eideen@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  This will also happen to Ext4. You just wouldn’t know it.

  source

  • TCB13@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I’m confused with your answer. BTRFS is good and reliable. Ext4 gets fucked at the slightest issue.

    source

    • Eideen@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Yes both BTRFS and Ext4 are vulnerable to unplanned powerloss when writes are in flight. Commonly knows as a write hole.

      For BTRFS since it use of Copy of Write, it is more vulnerable. As metadata needs to be updated and more. Ext4 does not have CoW.

      source

      • Atemu@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Ext4 does not have CoW.

        That’s the only true part of this comment.

        As for everything else:

        Ext4 uses journaling to ensure consistency.

        btrfs’ CoW makes it resistant to that issue by its nature; writes go elsewhere anyways, so you can delay the “commit” until everything is truly written and only then update the metadata (using a similar scheme again).

        Please read en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journaling_file_system.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • TCB13@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        For BTRFS since it use of Copy of Write, it is more vulnerable. As metadata needs to be updated and more. Ext4 does not have CoW.

        This is where theory and practice diverge and I bet a lot of people here will essentially have the same experience I have. I will never run an Ext filesystem again, not ever. BTRFS, ZFS, XFS all far superior and more reliable.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • Cyber@feddit.uk ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Never had an issue with EXT4.

      Had a problem on a NAS where BTRFS was taking “too long” for systemD to check it, so just didn’t mount it… bit of config tweaking and all is well again.

      I use EXT* and BTRFS where ever I can because I can manipulate it with standard tools (inc gparted).

      I have 1 LVM system which was interesting, but I wouldn’t do it that way in the future (used to add drives on a media PC)

      And as for ZFS … I’d say it’s very similar to BTRFS, but just slightly too complex on Linux with all the licensing issues, etc. so I just can’t be bothered with it.

      As a throw-away comment, I’d say ZFS is used by TrusNAS (not a problem, just sayin’…) and… that’s about it??

      As to the OPs original question, I agree with the others here… something’s not right there, but it’s probably not the filesystem.

      source