Floatplane is more of a pattern competitor than YouTube.
Comment on YouTube now suggests new content *by colour*
A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 year agoThat was youtube, before it was sold.
There will never be another one again. Storage, Bandwidth, Server, etc etc costs would be too astronomical for anyone but another multi-billion dollar company to spin up a competitor.
Bgugi@lemmy.world 1 year ago
31337@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Not much server storage and bandwidth is needed if using p2p, like peertube.
A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 year ago
and considering i’ve never heard about it until you just mentioned it, I guess that means its very not big and very not a youtube competitor.
31337@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
I believe it works like Bittorent (and things like Windows updates) where there is a swarm of peers that simultaneously upload and download to/from eachother, so the original creator, or any single user, doesn’t necessarily need much bandwidth. There are some disadvantages to this, but it is manageable, and works for many other things. If it actually became a thing, I imagine sponsored/patreon-funded creators would pay someone to seed their videos to ensure availability and quality. Fans would probably help too. Technically, it’s a viable option.
But yeah, with how walled-garden the Internet has become, it probably won’t become popular without massive amounts of marketing and doing things like signing exclusivity deals with popular creators, which needs a lot of money.
A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Thats still going to get up petabytes of bandwidth at scale, and it will be sobs like you eating the cost of it. Which is why it’ll never work.
Bandwidth is cheaper the bigger in bulk you buy it. All your peer2peer idea does is the same thing that every business in America does.
Socialize the costs and privatize the profits.