Comment on What Meta’s Fediverse Plans Mean for Threads Users

• originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  that is one of my only actual concerns. he who controls the protocol, controls the 'verse.

  source

  • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    It’s far worse. They’re making improvements only on their side. The protocol everyone uses will lack the features their protocol offers. In other words, their side of the garden is now greener than ours, and one day, their side will be so majestic and beautiful compared to ours that almost nobody will want to visit it anymore, and like a flame without fuel, the Fediverse will Extinguish on its own.

    source

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Ha.. no.

      As I said before, their instance and it's bells and whistles are irrelevant to my instance. Me and my instance only care about The ap protocol. I have no reason to fear their instance as long as it's pumping out the standard protocol. Anything not standard gets dropped.

      Zero problem here.

      source

      • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Oh, be assured that threads will one day defederate and build a wall so you can’t access their content anymore. The Fediverse need to have a critical mass of users to survive when it happens, but if the features thread offers are too compelling and the majority of the new accounts are made in threads, the Fediverse is screwed.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • sour@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        for profit company that enabled genocide is problem

        source

        • -> View More Comments