“They have been known to cause accidents”
No source, but there’s sources that show they reduce the number of people speeding this making the roads safer for non driver users by reducing the number of accidents.
Comment on Get to work, crackheads
JayDee@lemmy.ml 5 months agoIm not a fan of them because they have been known to cause accidents in the past from people trying to slow down and not get ticketed. That and it only slows people down in that specific area. You slow down, drive past it, then just speed back up.
I think Europe uses a better system, where you post two cameras on either end of the road you want to regulate the speed of. You take pictures of the license plates and time how long they were in the road for, then divide the distance by time to determine average speed. If that speed is above the legal limit, you look up the plate and they get a ticket in the mail. It’s lower tech because it doesn’t need LiDar, it’s harder to ‘cheat’, and it can be pretty cheap for regulating long stretches of road without exits.
Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
JayDee@lemmy.ml 5 months ago
Good call. I’ve taken those accusations for granted for a while. I’ve now edited the original comment.
zakobjoa@lemmy.world 5 months ago
While the system you describe does exist a lot in Europe the single cameras are much lower tech. They don’t have to read the license plate (twice!) correctly – they just take a picture. And while the mobile ones (non-descript grey van with blacked out rear windows parked at the side of the road) do use LIDAR, the static ones use just induction coils that are put into the road surface about 2m apart, rivht where the camera is looking. In Germany they’ll often put these coils in both directions of the road and just randomly turn the camera around, though newer ones just work in both directions all the time.