So now every site has cringe popups that nobody reads or understands, thanks regulators!!
It’s not the law that mandates the awful UI of those popups… it’s Google. I’m an adwords publisher, on my blog and a couple of (formerly!) popular web-apps. My sites were all compliant with the legislation, but not with Google’s policy for adwords publishers. Their algorithm sent me an e-mail threatening to cut off my income unless I implemented one of their “approved” cookie scripts. As any fool knows, it’s simply not possible to contact a real human at Google, so I was forced to do as they wished. So now all my sites have pointless, annoying cookie popups.
Everyone hates those popups, but don’t blame the legislation - blame Google for forcing the whole Internet into malicious compliance.
richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 9 months ago
And fuck the rest of the world?
Anarchist nonsense. Zero government = total chaos. The strong eats the weak. Like now, but worse.
LWD@lemm.ee 9 months ago
“Uphold the values of the Constitution, otherwise fuck off” doesn’t sound like a zero-government stance to me. If anything, it’s pretty clearly conditional.
At least, as clear as a Lemmy comment can get
richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 9 months ago
There’s a period. It reads “in all other matters, government fuck off”.
LWD@lemm.ee 9 months ago
Except they didn’t say “I’m an anarchist.”
They said
troyunrau@lemmy.ca 9 months ago
You’re getting downvoted because Lemmy. But you’re absolutely right. Laissez-faire doesn’t work.
metaStatic@kbin.social 9 months ago
If you think laissez-faire is a just hierarchy I have some carbon offsets to sell you.
BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 9 months ago
Nothing laissez-faire about regulatory capture…
Eldritch@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Anarchism, The actual anarchism. Has nothing to do with laissez-faire. Anarcho-capitalists are oxymorons. Always figuratively, and often even literally. They’re capitalist, not anarchists. They just believe that their capital should give them them power over you. But not vice versa.
Anarchists and actual libertarians are not against governance. They just think it should be as flat and local as possible. That it shouldn’t be large hierarchical monolithic structures that people have a hard time understanding or lobbying. Structures that also have a hard time understanding individuals and serving them.
auzas_1337@lemmy.zip 9 months ago
Not sure if OP meant “zero-government” because that’s not what anarchism as a political theory and movement is about.
HidingCat@kbin.social 9 months ago
This is why I don't like the Fediverse as much. Can you believe that loon got so many upvotes? Describes the average mentality around these parts, what a turn off.
HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 9 months ago
Where do you think every website in the entire world is hosted? It's America, obviously. We're the only country with a Constitution after all!
Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world 9 months ago
I kinda don’t even think these conversations should happen until internet access is seen as a guaranteed right- through govt regulation or whatever. Otherwise, I feel like these takes are putting the cart before the horse - so to speak.
PS - I know I am replying to you but i my comments are geared towards OP