Comment on Supreme Court stays out of fight over transgender student bathroom access
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 8 months agoWhich part is unclear? Within the given context what about the 14th amendment and Title IX conflicts?
You can not discriminate on the basis of sex, AND be indiscriminate equally to everyone, so what’s the problem?
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Gender and sex are not the same thing. Sounds like you agree with Indiana that biological men should use the male bathrooms since their sex is male.
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 8 months ago
I said not discriminate, and to not discriminate equally, so you must be jumping through mad hoops to get to that conclusion.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 8 months ago
It isn’t illegal discrimination to keep males out of the female bathroom. It appears you don’t really understand the court case or the words sex or gender. Discriminate doesn’t mean what you think it means. It means to pick. As long as you don’t do it on a protected class, it’s legal. Sex is a protected class. Gender identify is not.
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 8 months ago
According to the DOL, gender identity is a protected class though, that brings up Title VII.
www.dol.gov/agencies/oasam/…/gender-identity
Doesn’t really matter what you say anyway since SCOTUS already declined to weigh in.