Comment - FBXL Lotide

i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

I want a community where people can use AI to help build a tool and be able to post about it here. But unfortunately, I’m just not seeing that. The AI-generated apps seem to be coupled to a drive-by, AI generated post (and comment replies) all full of em dashes and the standard Claude slop language.

So, yes, mandate an AI tag. Hold posters to it and remove violators, because it seems to always be the same class of “contributors” that are cosplaying as software developers.

Not sure if your rule changes are touching this, but the worst offenders I don’t want to see here are:

posting and commenting text written entirely by AI
not open sourcing or giving any visibility into their code
adopting a paid model

The people doing that remind me of the people who would approach me 20 years ago saying “hey I have an idea for an app I want you to build and I’ll give you 5% of my company. It’s like Facebook for dogs, but I need you to sign an NDA before I say any more”.

original

Sort:hotnew top

terabyterex@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
i agree with you. i have been working orofessionally as a software developer for over 27 years. i’ll use ai to help research something but i cant atand low effort full ai projects being posted.

i always saw non devs using ai to fully generate something for them personally to fix a very custom need but why do these people post projects thry honestly had no hand in.

original
- Auli@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Man it is great for creating custom apps to scratch your need. I have custom programs to filter out blocklists for one country and dynamically update firewall rules on unified gateways. Stuff that well never be put in as it would hurt their paid subscription.
  
  original
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
The first bullet is, the other two are covered in the current rule 7 that just went live this week.

While part of promo, this is just about its own item here. In part because it could be something like “I wrote some of this script, got some ai help to talk to this closed device, here’s what I’m using” which doesn’t really fit promo, but still garners a lot of negative attention and comments.

I’m a bit hopeful this one would be of slightly broader benefit than just the straight up promo posts (which has a good amount of requirements now to filter out the garbage, though it does put some delays on f/loss projects that are well intentioned).

original
- i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Just found the other rule post. Looks great!
  
  original
halm@leminal.space ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

I want a community where people can use AI to help build a tool

Sure, that’s github

and be able to post about it here

Fine, but others including myself want that slop as far away from here as possible. Maybe start another community? I suggest calling it c/vibehosted.

original
- hirihit640@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  
  Fine, but others including myself want that slop as far away from here as possible
  
  And there are people like me who are fine with moderate AI use and would rather judge the project themselves rather than have them rejected outright.
  
  original
  - halm@leminal.space ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Why a vote to switch up an existing community? The admins have proposed the [AI] tag to mitigate slop projects.
    
    You said you wanted a community to post vibe coded projects, go ahead and set it up. I don’t see why it needs to be foisted onto c/self hosted, unless you have some vested interest in boosting sloppy mcslopface projects.
    
    original
    hirihit640@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    I’m not sure I understand. First off I’m not the same person as GP. Second, the admins are proposing an AI tag, which I’m supportive of. I’m just saying that I am OK with AI-assisted projects being posted to this community (with the AI tag of course)
    
    original