I’d say that just reinforces their point that even “bad” EVs don’t have significant issues with range. But yeah, a bit weird to emphasise it.
Comment on Fear Mongering About Range Anxiety Has To Stop — CT Governor Calls Out EV Opponents
reddig33@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The irony of using a Bolt EV in the accompanying photograph. A car with some of the slowest DC fast charging, and a battery that’s been reduced to 80% capacity for three years by the company who makes it.
vividspecter@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Pretzilla@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s actually a great example.
Bolt has about 250 mile range and it’s great for everything not too far, and even ok for infrequent road trips.
And your claim about 80% reduction is false and misleading.
Why do you hate EV’s?
reddig33@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I own a fucking Bolt. I don’t hate EVs. It’s difficult to get the advertised range when GM insists on binding it with a software update that prevents charging above 80% as a workaround while they are still sorting out their battery recall years later.
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That’s a precationary limit because of a pending recall. The batteries aren’t degraded to 80%.
halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You can’t use it above 80%, the reason you can’t doesn’t make a difference for your ability to drive the car.
Kadaj21@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Right and for newer vehicles there is a couple of 2020 Bolts and a 2022 Bolt EUV for low $20k or under in my area. If I travel a little bit away from my area I have found 2017 Bolts for $15k.
As mentioned they’re not great for road tripping because of their slow L3 charge speeds, but perfect for me to use for my commute or local-ish running. It or a EUV will probably be my replacement for my ‘08 Rabbit whenever it goes, but I only put on about 3k miles a year on my car soooo it might be a while. I also need to see if i can put a family of 5 in one (reverse car seat, booster, and older kiddo in the back). I think they’ll do it.