freamon@endlesstalk.org 1 year ago
That’s a very positive spin on quite a shitty situation (especially if lemmy.ml goes kaputt)
freamon@endlesstalk.org 1 year ago
That’s a very positive spin on quite a shitty situation (especially if lemmy.ml goes kaputt)
emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
I mean, the .ml domain belongs to Mali and they have every right to take it back.
freamon@endlesstalk.org 1 year ago
True. It might have been better though if the Lemmy devs hadn’t been such cheapskates and forked over the 10 bucks it takes to get a domain name that isn’t sketchy.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Pretty sure they went with .ml not for price reasons, but because they liked to pretend it stood for their political ideology.
Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
They stated themselves that it was for price reasons.
freamon@endlesstalk.org 1 year ago
Maybe. I read the idea about it standing for Marxist/Leninist, but there’s thousands of TLDs now - if you can get .diamonds and .world, there’s probably something that would evoke the same lefty idea (although maybe lemmy pre-dates the new domains, I don’t know)
WhoRoger@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Did we know before it’s sketchy?
RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The parent domain was apparently well known to be a common host of phishing domains and scam sites. Free domains tend to attract those types, so that’s a good reason from the start not to use that if you want your site to be reliably accessible and findable on search engines.
RxBrad@lemmy.world 1 year ago
My work uses zScaler for its Internet web filters. zScaler has everything *.ml blocked.
So yeah, it’s fairly well-known to be sketchy.
Dee@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I did, I just messed up and didn’t tell anybody. I’m sorry folks, this is on me.
SlovenianSocket@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Yes. Hosting a service in a country other than where a TLD is designated for is bad practice and common knowledge for any web developer
emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
lemmy.ml was a sort of prototype made by the devs of the lemmy software. It wasn’t really meant for widespread public adoption. So it makes sense that they went with a free domain.
001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
Lol they could’ve just spend $10 from the donations they receive to secure an actual .com domain
ziggurism@lemmy.world 1 year ago
“Every right”? No. They have the power to do so but that doesn’t make it right. They sold those domains fair and square. Contracts were signed.
emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Domains aren’t sold, they are leased for a period of time. In this case the lease was for ten years and is lapsing now.