Comment on "B-b-but don't you need our cotton???"

PugJesus@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

Explanation: In the US Civil War, a major component of the secessionist pro-slavery South was that the European powers - especially France and the UK, which were major purchasers of Southern cotton - would intervene on the side of the South in some manner. With Southern ports blockaded by the Northern navy, Europe was starved of cotton, vital for clothing and industry, making their intervention necessary! Only a matter of time, eh, fellow Southern gentlemen?

However, slavery was deeply unpopular in the UK and France at the time, despite their reliance on Southern cotton. Both the UK and France had elites who were in favor of the South winning the Civil War, but were reliant enough on popular opinion that they could not risk outright support of the South without getting ousted from government. The UK - a parliamentary democracy - more than France - a strongman dictatorship, effectively, under Napoleon III at the time.

Once the North made the Emancipation Proclamation, establishing the fight as not merely the South supporting slavery, but the North, furthermore, explicitly coming out against it, public opinion in France and the UK became so pro-North that all hope of recognition became a distant memory as the North ground the South into dust over the next two years of war.

On top of that, the UK just started growing cotton en masse in Egypt and India in response to the war.

original
Sort:hotnewtop