Comment on Fact-checking for the "No" referendum pamphlet was not compulsory
unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 1 year agoThey had sources, how do we know that you aren’t being disingenuous by not providing sources?
Comment on Fact-checking for the "No" referendum pamphlet was not compulsory
unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 1 year agoThey had sources, how do we know that you aren’t being disingenuous by not providing sources?
Affidavit@aussie.zone 1 year ago
This alleged ‘fact-checking’ is an opinion piece. The ‘sources’ in the article are also opinion pieces—half of them from themselves.
UnfortunateDoorHinge@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Fact checking 101. You need to provide counter evidence and cross examination to deduce that a claim is invalid, unreliable or a misrepresentation.
unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 1 year ago
So is the pamphlet they were reviewing, so was your previous comment. What’s your point?