No it doesn’t, it just says that the case was different and that it wasn’t in front of a jury, it doesn’t give the details of the difference.
Comment on Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fight
Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 1 year ago
ITT: lots of people wondering why Apple won and Google lost, but not reading the article, which explains the difference of the cases.
deweydecibel@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 1 year ago
ITC: Someone not understanding the difference between not understanding and not agreeing.
bassomitron@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yeah, fuck that. I definitely don’t agree with the ruling. iOS is far more restrictive than Android, because at least Android provides the ability to easily install alternatives (F-droid app store is an awesome alternative for many types of apps and it’s all free). Sure, Android dominates the market globally, but in the US–nd many other countries-- Apple has the majority of marketshare. …yahoo.com/…/ios-vs-android-market-share-13525164…
It’s just bullshit to me that Apple gets a free pass for clearly being anti-competitive. I’m glad this trial struck down Google’s app store monopoly, but all phone OS’s should be forbidden from doing it.
bigFab@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Totally agree with your idea, but so you know Apple has lost another legal fight. Europe condemnes it for monopoly of not only App Store, but also Safari and other services. About a month ago.
yamanii@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The browser monopoly really is a stupid thing, what even is the point of installing any other browser if they have to be reskins of safari?
Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 year ago
True, thread is full of both types
inverted_deflector@startrek.website 1 year ago
Yeah and honestly Im fine with courts opening up the platforms more to make at ths point, but the issue is that apple got the win.