Comment on Excuse me, but the industries AI is disrupting are not lucrative
GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 9 months agoWhy? Why can an AI not replace a CEO? And why has CEO compensation risen, while average worker compensation dropped, all while worker output has increased over the past decades? That seems like simple math, that the money isn’t going to who it should be going to and is just going to management and investors because they make the rules
Blackhole@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
The issue you’re speaking about is an issue of oligopoles and giant businesses, not ceos and management. It’s a breakdown of economic principles, namely, supply and demand of labor, due to oligopoles.
GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 9 months ago
And giant businesses and oligopolies are led by… who exactly? Sure, you can say “not all CEOs” but still, too many CEOs.
I do appreciate the added nuance and more accuracy tho.
Blackhole@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
There are thousands of unproblmatic ceos to every problematic ceo.
You issue is with the top couple hundred businesses. There are literally 100s of thousands of ceos, managers, and leadership individuals who are not part of the problem. Look at the responses here. This group think mob would have you believe every single ceo is Satan.
otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 months ago
Thousands for every one, eh? You got a citation for that wild claim, friendo? I mean, talk about bootlicking. FFS