Comment on PlayStation To Delete A Ton Of TV Shows Users Already Paid For

• netchami@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I’m occasionally buying used Blu-rays from eBay, ripping them using MakeMKV, putting the content on my Jellyfin server and sharing it with my friends and family over Tailscale. Works like a dream and no one can do anything about it. youtube.com/watch?v=RZ8ijmy3qPo

  source

  • pathief@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Can you ELI5 why you need/use Tailscsle on your setup?

    source

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Because allowing access to your VPS/homelab without VPN is like having a one night stand without a condom. You might be ok one time but eventually your gonna wake up with a nasty virus

      source
    • goldgate@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      To make the server accessible via internet, it’s a VPN service.

      You could do it without tailscale too, but using it makes things extremely easy.

      source
  • goldgate@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    How much are you paying for tailscale?

    source

    • netchami@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Nothing. It’s free for 3 users with a limit of 100 devices. The traffic isn’t relayed through Tailscale servers, instead, Tailscale just orchestrates the peer-to-peer connections.

      source
• lolcatnip@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  You’re missing the point.

  source

  • lud@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    No, you guys are missing the point. If you want to own something buy Blu-ray’s, piracy isn’t justifiable just because you don’t want to buy it.

    You don’t have to justify piracy like you idiots always tries to do. Who cares?

    source

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Calling people idiots doesn’t make you right, and trying to make a different point doesn’t show that you understood the original point—quite the opposite.

      The point is that if a company can choose not to honor its legal obligation to consumers who have purchased content from them, then there is no reason for consumers to honor their legal obligation to refrain from accessing the same content outside the system the company has provided—or in this case failed to provide.

      Moreover, if the legal system of your country doesn’t require everyone to uphold their legal obligations, then why should we allow it to hold us to the obligations it has placed on us?

      Now you’ll probably write a reply that reply that shows no understanding of the difference between ownership and licensing, or between theft and unauthorized access, but you can’t say I didn’t try.

      source

      • lud@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        The company did honor its legal obligations.

        Whenever it’s morally right is a different discussion.

        I don’t care about your point. I just think the constant attempts of justification are really annoying. Like it or not, I will continue to complain about that.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • luthis@lemmy.nz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      But if buying isn’t owning then… why buy?

      source

      • lud@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Because buying Blu-ray’s is owning?

        source