Comment on Is this right? Not a Star Trek fan.

• lunatic@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I mean, much as I’d like Sisko to come back in anything regarding DS9, that Brooks doesn’t want to do it is actually convenient for the story: Sisko’s in the Celestial Temple with the Prophets, let him stay there. LD has shown we can have a great DS9 episode without him.

  It’s a shame he’s not interested, but there are plenty of BIPOC actors who’d love to have a chance at being in Trek.

  source

  • FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Sure, you could definitely do a DS9 reunion like the TNG reunion on Picard without Sisko (and Nog, unfortunately)… but would people really want to see that?

    source

    • lunatic@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Also without Odo, similarly unfortunately. And yes, I would. Hopefully better than on S3 PIC though… eesh

      source

      • FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Oh yes, I forgot about Rene Auberjonois.

        source
  • VindictiveJudge@startrek.website ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I can definitely buy Sisko as a king under the mountain figure, believed by the Bajorans to return in their hour of greatest need, like Arthur for the British.

    source
• Nacktmull@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I think I watched that one. Is it the one where he seems a little weird and plays the piano? Do you remember if he gave a reason to not want to do more DS9?

  source

  • FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I don’t remember, no. But yes, that’s the documentary. They also come up with a hypothetical first episode of a series taking place 20 years later.

    source