Comment on Is this right? Not a Star Trek fan.

• Nacktmull@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Why wouldn’t Brooks?

  source

  • FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    He seems totally disinterested if the DS9 documentary was anything to go on.

    source

    • lunatic@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I mean, much as I’d like Sisko to come back in anything regarding DS9, that Brooks doesn’t want to do it is actually convenient for the story: Sisko’s in the Celestial Temple with the Prophets, let him stay there. LD has shown we can have a great DS9 episode without him.

      It’s a shame he’s not interested, but there are plenty of BIPOC actors who’d love to have a chance at being in Trek.

      source

      • FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Sure, you could definitely do a DS9 reunion like the TNG reunion on Picard without Sisko (and Nog, unfortunately)… but would people really want to see that?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • VindictiveJudge@startrek.website ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I can definitely buy Sisko as a king under the mountain figure, believed by the Bajorans to return in their hour of greatest need, like Arthur for the British.

        source
    • Nacktmull@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I think I watched that one. Is it the one where he seems a little weird and plays the piano? Do you remember if he gave a reason to not want to do more DS9?

      source

      • FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I don’t remember, no. But yes, that’s the documentary. They also come up with a hypothetical first episode of a series taking place 20 years later.

        source