This assumes that ideas have a central significance. I suspect that this is an illusion of perspective.
Comment on How do I make myself smarter?
bloopernova@programming.dev 1 year ago
Read more. Go to the local library and read.
cameron_vale@lemm.ee 1 year ago
kakes@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Step two: Try not to be so pretentious and closed-minded.
Being “smart” comes from the ability to see the world from other perspectives. Perspective is the gift books give us, and the reason you’ll get “smarter” from reading them. You gain nothing from taking the easy route and writing these sorts of things off as “beneath you.”
cameron_vale@lemm.ee 1 year ago
right back at you
kakes@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
If you’re truly looking for some grand “Truth” of the world, the only people that can provide that to you are religions and con-men. So my honest advice in that case would be to go to your choice of religious gathering and talk to the people there.
actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
If perspective is illusory, then learning more subjective perspectives will help you see commonalities and find additional ways to address them.
You may not believe that the writer has valid perspectives, but you will learn more about how perspectives are presented.
cameron_vale@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I don’t mean that the writer might have invalid perspectives, I mean that the assertion that ideas have a central importance is itself an error of perspective. Thinking might not matter as much as we think it does.
TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Especially books with topics you don’t agree with. And think about what you’re reading. You’ll either change your mind, become unsure but not committed to that side, or you decide that position has its flaws and you were right. In the end, you can discuss that position and sound more intelligent because you have the arguments to back up your position.