Then do it with bots. Bots are uncorruptable or at least perfectly auditable.
Comment on If power corrupts, or power attracts the corrupt, why do we have moderators?
dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Because the GIFT corrupts even more, and faster.
cameron_vale@lemm.ee 1 year ago
dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Alright, we’ll write a bot that can accurately moderate arbitrary internet content with an acceptably low rate of false negatives and false positives.
You first.
cameron_vale@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Here’s an idea
When you read a post you vote it.
This vote is also sticks to the person who wrote it.
Whenever he posts, his post automatically get a (weighted) rating based on the history of your votes of his posts.
Also, any post he votes automatically gets a (weighted) rating, for you, on his recommendation, based on his rating.
This post voting rating propagates. And of course works for both positive and negative voting.
Then you filter however.
Everybody starts at 0. Which is also informative of course.
ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
That just means that folk from vulnerable minorities each individually have to downvote every new troll account targetting them, until the person just moves on to a new troll account.
Which in turn is how you end up with communities full of nothing but white, middle class western men who think that trolling each other is a national sport.
Deceptichum@kbin.social 1 year ago
Okay, and if a new account posts CSAM, how does that get removed ASAP?
cerement@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
bots are only “uncorruptible” in so far as they are built “corrupt” at their very conception
cameron_vale@lemm.ee 1 year ago
but you can look at the code. That inhibits shenanigans
cameron_vale@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Also, the mods are subject to GIFT too. In all probability even even moreso.
Hello, yes, I think that I would be a great moral authority. I am just the person to tell people what they can and cannot say. That’s me to a T.
You don’t want that guy in charge in a million years.