Comment on ChatGPT generates fake data set to support scientific hypothesis

BT_7274@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

How many times do we have to play this game before people realize it’s not a researcher, lawyer, doctor, or anything that has to rely on facts and established, valid data?

It’s a next-word generator that’s remarkably good at sounding human. Yes, this can often lead to accurate sounding information, but it doesn’t actually “know” anything. Not in any sense that could be relied on.

source
Sort:hotnewtop