Comment on Jesse is smarter than what we give him credit for.
Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 10 months agoNo system can avoid arbitrary bullshit because the earth doesn’t go around the sun in an amount of time that’s an exact multiple of the time it takes to rotate.
reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Sounds like why fuck with it then. There’s a cost to converting that will be paid only to replace one set of arbitrary bullshit with another set of arbitrary bullshit. You can say you prefer one bullshit to another and no one can dispute you on that, but in the end it’s just one set of bullshit vs another and I’m already committed to the current one.
Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 10 months ago
It’s probably too difficult to implement now because of computers being entrenched in the existing system. If we were going to implement it, it would have been 100 years ago.
Malfeasant@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Same issue with a dozenal number system…
_Mantissa@lemmy.world 10 months ago
There are pros and cons to every alternative calendar. Just as there are pros and cons to the metric system, hybrid cars, and renewable energy. There is a short term cost to switching to better systems and a long term reward. The earlier we switch, the more reward we reap. Not saying that 13 months is the best alternative but the reasoning of systemic changes hinges on being willing to front costs that we know will be worth it in the long run. Our current one is not causing enough issues and it’s upfront cost to switch is too high so we will likely not even seriously consider changing it for a long time. But we can still acknowledge that we should use a better system and that adapting earlier will only benefit us in the long run.
reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 10 months ago
What is actually better about it? It’s a bit more intuitive except for where it isn’t, and it forces people to develop an entirely new concept of the 0th of January (and occasionally 0th of June). What do we do on the 0th? How does that fit into things that cycle with a period of 1 month? It breaks the idea that a 1 month period is equivalent to a 4 week period, which is supposed to be the entirety of why we’re doing this in the first place.
_Mantissa@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Right now, a month is 4.345 weeks and 30.4167 days. it makes scheduling and budgeting kind of a nightmare. in a 13 month calendar, each month has 4 weeks exactly and 28.096 days. the 0th of january/july isn’t a day of the week like Sunday, it’s just an extra day. That makes it a lot easier to call it a holiday, pay out like it’s bonus time, add at the end of calculations, etc. I think it’s actually easier to grasp conceptually than our current way of handling leap years. The main benefit though is that even if you did include 0th days as a day of the week you would still only have ~4.1 weeks per month. The decimals are much lower and as a result much less frequent. 30.4 days per month is atrocious, it’s basically a coinflip. Doing any kind of math on our current calendar system is a giant pain and would be much improved with any system that can lower that decimal value.
As for practical benefits for the majority of folk that don’t make budgets or deal with scheduling, Every month now starts on Sunday and ends on Saturday plus we get a new holiday, neat. Every 16th, for example, is now a Monday. Honestly, everything about it sounds better to me and it’s not even my favorite alternative calendar.