Ahh, kind of like the Chinese.
I mean — he’s defending human creativity and he’s kind of right. AI can recreate variations of the things it is trained on, but it doesn’t create new paradigms.
Texas_Hangover@lemm.ee 10 months ago
canni@lemmy.one 10 months ago
Literally the world’s oldest, continuous civilization. Pretty sure they got one or two things out there in the last 4000 years
Kodemystic@lemmy.kodemystic.dev 10 months ago
Alphafold?
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Yeah, also I think there is something about the human connection and communicating personal ideas and feelings that just isn’t there with AI generated art. I could see a case for an argument that a lot of music today is recorded by artists who didn’t write that music, and that they are expressing their own feelings through their performance of someone else’s creation. And is it really all that different if an AI wrote something that resonated with an artist who ultimately performed it? Which for a good chunk of pop-culture regurgitations may be completely valid. But in my opinion, the best art, communicates emotion, which an experience unique to biology, AI might be able to approximate it, and sure there’s a human prompting the AI who might genuinely have those feelings, but there’s a hollowness to it that I struggle to ignore. But maybe I’m just getting older and will be yelling at clouds before long.