So Google are a bunch of scammers?
I mean, yes?
user_AW11@lemmy.world 10 months ago
From the EU, I was one of the ones that reported this.
european-union.europa.eu/contact-eu/write-us_en
Perhaps “'privacy laws”.
But I made a point about: monopolistic behavior
And what is funny:
Your FBI advices the use of adblockers.
MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 10 months ago
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Yeah, their whole business model is a scam. A currently (mostly) legal one, but a scam nonetheless.
lorkano@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I can’t blame them for wanting to restore monetization as adblockers removed most of the revenue from those platforms. But fighting adblockers is not a way to do this. They should either change entire YouTube business model to pay to access, or rework ads to be less annoying. If ads were not annoying as fuck, people wouldn’t be pushed to install adblock in the first place.
LemmysMum@lemmy.world 10 months ago
For every person using an ad blocker there’s 1000 that don’t. Going after the fraction of a percent of perceived lost revenue from people who wouldn’t click your ads or buy your products anyway is just the epitome of greed.
Coach@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Agreed. There is always a subset of customers in which a business loses money. The corporations today have grown soft and cannot stomach a loss. It’s time we stop catering to weak companies and start catering to those who understand the risks associated with owning a business.
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Are ads cheaper now? I imagine with combined slots of ads, their duration, size on the screen they aren’t as expensive as they were and letting their clients get more for the same price. Compare one textual block from early android’s free apps to fullscreen video ads being a norm, same with youtube, chains of long videos. It seems they caused the deterioration of their own market. I imagine what actual statistics of clicks-per-show look like if they are so desperate. We sometimes hear of how premium superbowl or olympics ads are, and here it feels the exclusivity of access to consumer isn’t valued. You buy a slot, but your ad is sandwiched between other random products. How is that exclusive? Businesses would get used to it, but their incencitive isn’t there. If they pay big bucks, they want to buy a billboard, not a small string in a tabloid.
As other person have said, users with blocks are a minority. But, what’s important, bashing them is a reputational thing. Google’s advertising and data-farming business. This gesture is good to promote at the board meating, to their regulars, and maybe charge a bit more. Also important that these blockers kill tracking devices like invisible pixels, so it may be a bigger reason to implement that than some loss of ad revenue.
lorkano@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Google is very smart with ad prices because they are actually not constant. Advertisers have bots that actually bid how much they want to pay for an ad, and if your bot wins, your ad is shown